<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.devincontext.com/about/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.devincontext.com</link>
	<description>The Case For Personal Growth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 20:52:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.devincontext.com/about/comment-page-1/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 05:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devincontext.com/?page_id=2#comment-184</guid>
		<description>Hi Haider -- I like that point about not needing to abandon the whole project just because there are some aspects of it we might not agree with -- just as we wouldn&#039;t say that philosophy or physics is useless because there are some philosophers or physicists we disagree with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Haider &#8212; I like that point about not needing to abandon the whole project just because there are some aspects of it we might not agree with &#8212; just as we wouldn&#8217;t say that philosophy or physics is useless because there are some philosophers or physicists we disagree with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.devincontext.com/about/comment-page-1/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 05:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devincontext.com/?page_id=2#comment-183</guid>
		<description>Hi Evan -- somehow I didn&#039;t see the comments here before, but in any event, perhaps it&#039;s true that personal development didn&#039;t need any defenders for a long time because it had no serious critics.  Now that is changing, and perhaps now it could be said to &quot;need&quot; -- or at least benefit from -- serious defenders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Evan &#8212; somehow I didn&#8217;t see the comments here before, but in any event, perhaps it&#8217;s true that personal development didn&#8217;t need any defenders for a long time because it had no serious critics.  Now that is changing, and perhaps now it could be said to &#8220;need&#8221; &#8212; or at least benefit from &#8212; serious defenders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haider</title>
		<link>http://www.devincontext.com/about/comment-page-1/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Haider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 10:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devincontext.com/?page_id=2#comment-178</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris,

I think the topics you address in your blog are extremely important, since many &quot;students&quot; of personal growth choose to ignore criticisms of personal growth, when it&#039;s healthier to consider what&#039;s being said about personal growth, and incorporate it into our understanding of the subject, if the criticisms are valid.

I&#039;ve gone through phases when I didn&#039;t want to contribute to the field of personal growth because I felt like I was creating more noise, rather than contributing to the signal.

I later realized that I can understand what I don&#039;t like about the field (e.g. bad advice, narrow-minded approach, etc), and offer an alternative. Just because there are negative traits or potential harms to personal growth doesn&#039;t mean we have to abandon the whole thing (which many critics seem to advocate).

I look forward to many more thought-provoking articles from you! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,</p>
<p>I think the topics you address in your blog are extremely important, since many &#8220;students&#8221; of personal growth choose to ignore criticisms of personal growth, when it&#8217;s healthier to consider what&#8217;s being said about personal growth, and incorporate it into our understanding of the subject, if the criticisms are valid.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve gone through phases when I didn&#8217;t want to contribute to the field of personal growth because I felt like I was creating more noise, rather than contributing to the signal.</p>
<p>I later realized that I can understand what I don&#8217;t like about the field (e.g. bad advice, narrow-minded approach, etc), and offer an alternative. Just because there are negative traits or potential harms to personal growth doesn&#8217;t mean we have to abandon the whole thing (which many critics seem to advocate).</p>
<p>I look forward to many more thought-provoking articles from you! <img src='http://www.devincontext.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://www.devincontext.com/about/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 02:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devincontext.com/?page_id=2#comment-2</guid>
		<description>If you don&#039;t answer your critics, and will only talk to those in the club, this can build great authority (this was effectively the strategy of the western medical profession and the Freudians) - it&#039;s worked a treat.

There is also the &#039;everything is what you believe it to be&#039; line, so common in new age circles.  So the critics are entitled to their perspective, which they&#039;ve created.  It is hard to see how critique could have a place in this perspective (and how it can avoid nihilism).

I think what you plan to do is very important and much needed.  Wishing you every possible success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don&#8217;t answer your critics, and will only talk to those in the club, this can build great authority (this was effectively the strategy of the western medical profession and the Freudians) &#8211; it&#8217;s worked a treat.</p>
<p>There is also the &#8216;everything is what you believe it to be&#8217; line, so common in new age circles.  So the critics are entitled to their perspective, which they&#8217;ve created.  It is hard to see how critique could have a place in this perspective (and how it can avoid nihilism).</p>
<p>I think what you plan to do is very important and much needed.  Wishing you every possible success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

